The Banalization of violence in the "Cities"

Subscribe the press version of Fazendo Media

Paulo Henrique Brazão - redacao@fazendomedia.com

“City of God” (Cidade de Deus) opened in August 2002 as the biggest brazilian promise to finally bring the Oscar. But, in the same ocasion, Eduardo Simões, journalist at "O Globo" and author of cinema reviews in the Rio Show section, surprised in choosing for the movie the famous “Bonequinho” (a classification system the paper uses) as the worst quotation ever, “leaving the theater”. Exaggeration? Certainly. But the argument of Eduardo's argument was the best definition of what the film would be: a fashioned slaughter among popcorns and shots, the middle class leaving the theater and going to a bar to drink their beer, and coming back to their homes as if nothing had happened.

 

Edição # 9 - december, 2003.

A friend of mine considers it the best motion picture he has ever seen. But it isn’t a “civic work”, to watch it as Zuenir Ventura has defined. In “City of God”, everything passes by the viewer’s eyes like something magic, that just exists in that projection, while, in real life, some of its 3,5 millions viewers probably did not come back home alive.

Another point the picture touches is the good and evil thing inside the the evil and good thing. First Fernando Meirelles defines who are the bandits and who are the good guys. Then he defines who is the bad bandit and who is the  good bandit. But the director doesn’t remember that a bandit is a bandit,  a criminous like any other. I don’t want to sound like our Secretary of Public Security, a little boy that seemed to have a little moustache and carry a swastika when he said about the deaths in a shooting in Ilha do Governador that “they weren`t twelve people, they were twelve traffickers”. But show the public that Cenoura and company were good guys and make us cheer for them is something really serious.

The publicity becomes more and more clear when the slum is brought into the television with the serie “City of Men” (Cidade dos Homens), of Rede Globo. Historically, the Brazilian society used to satirize everything it doesn’t know how to deal, like migrants and homossexuals, characters that, estereotyped as bumpkins and fags, make us laugh in the Saturday nights. And now it’s the time of the citrics Laranjinha and Acerola. Their expressions take the streets. The spoken language of the slum, specially when it reffers to the Portuguese mistakes, result of the lack of an education that should be universal, provokes laughs in parks and bars. One day, a classmate of mine, who makes the Publicity course in Federal Fluminense University, told me that he became a big fan of the series, specially because in the previous episode a character called another “norotic” (norótico), making this classmate stand up and aplaud. However, in the same scene, a man was on his knees with a gun in his head. And that’s what scares: this classmate didn’t notice it because he didn’t see or because it has become so banal in television that doesn’t deserve atention anymore?

While Laranjinha and Acerola make fun and go to Brasília to deliver a letter to the president, Douglas Silva and Darlan Cunha, the actors, complain that after the fame some ladies still hold tight their purses, afraid of beeing robbed by them. And this prejudice is the same that makes people laugh. As long as they are black boys they have no identity - this is the one our society built for them with its disregard. But it would be worse if the ladies, recognizing Laranjinha and Acerola, became more relieved and thought: “Oh, these represent no problem...”.